A New Lake—Water Not Lava—On Kilauea. #Landsat #NASA #USGS #Earth

A New Lake—Water Not Lava—On Kilauea

Between 2010 and 2018, a large lava lake bubbled and spattered within Kilauea's summit caldera. Then in May 2018, as part of a broader eruption that poured lava from fissures to the east, the lake swiftly drained and part of the caldera floor collapsed. This left a hole nearly as deep as One World Trade Center.

But that was not all Pele had in store. For about a year, the much-deeper and wider Halema'uma'u crater was relatively quiet. But in July 2019, helicopter pilots began to notice water pooling into a pond in the lowest part of the crater. Water levels have risen steadily ever since. Today, the lake—now with a rusty brown sheen on its surface due to chemical reactions taking place in the water—has an area larger than five football fields combined and a maximum depth of roughly 30 meters (100 feet).

The sequence of satellite images above shows Halema'uma'u crater before the lava lake drained (left), after the caldera floor had collapsed (middle), and after water pooled on the crater floor for nine months (right). The Operational Land Imager (OLI) on Landsat 8 acquired all three natural-color images.

When the lava lake was present, it appeared in the southeast part of Halema'uma'u, though a crust of partially solidified lava on its surface made it appear gray from above. (The circular light gray area with a thin plume of volcanic emissions rising from it marks the location of the lake.) After the caldera collapse, the terrain surrounding the lake changed dramatically, including the formation of a new 140-meter cliff (thin dark line) north of the crater. In the final image, the pond on the summit appears small from Landsat's perspective (30 meters per pixel). The photograph below, taken on April 21, offers a better sense of scale.

The explanation for the new pond is simple. "We have a drill hole a little more than one kilometer south of the crater where we measure the level of the water table," explained Don Swanson, a volcanologist at the U.S. Geological Survey's Hawaiian Volcano Observatory. "We know that the crater floor dropped a little more than 70 meters below the water table in 2018. Any time that you punch a hole below the level of the water table, water is eventually going to come in and fill that hole."

Explaining what the new pond means for the volcano is where the story gets more complicated and interesting. One of the key factors that controls explosive volcanic eruptions is how much water and other gases get caught up within the magma. If magma has a lot of dissolved gases and steam, pressure builds and explosive eruptions can result. If not, lava tends to flow gently from fissures in the ground—as has been the case at Kilauea for the past 200 years.

Calm eruptions are the exception, not the norm. Over the past 2,500 years, Kilauea has erupted explosively about 60 percent of the time, noted Swanson. "We have been misled by how calm it has been. If this was 1720 rather than 2020, then we would we would not have seen a lava flow for more than 200 years, and we may have thought Kilauea was always an explosive volcano."

There are two scenarios that could lead to an explosive eruption. "In one case, magma could rise quickly up the conduit and intersect with the lake," said Swanson. "In the second, the crater floor could collapse and drop all of the water down to a zone where it would be quickly heated into steam."

But that does not mean the next eruption will be explosive. "The next eruption could happen slowly and the water could evaporate," he said. "We do not want to be alarmist, but we also need to point out to the public that there is an increasing possibility of explosive eruptions at Kilauea."

One thing is quite certain: geologists will be closely monitoring Kilauea and its new lake with every tool available, including seismometers, thermal cameras, drones, helicopter surveys, and satellites. "Is the volcano in the process of reverting back to an explosive period that may last for centuries?" said Swanson. "Or is this just a little blip, and we are going to return to quiet lava flows like we had during the 19th and 20th centuries? Only time will tell."

NASA Earth Observatory images by Joshua Stevens, using Landsat data from the U.S. Geological Survey. USGS photo by Matthew Patrick. Story by Adam Voiland.

#Landsat #NASA #USGS #Earth

....

Vineesh V
Assistant Professor of Geography,
Directorate of Education,
Government of Kerala.
https://g.page/vineeshvc

Comments

Supervised Classification

Image Classification in Remote Sensing Image classification in remote sensing involves categorizing pixels in an image into thematic classes to produce a map. This process is essential for land use and land cover mapping, environmental studies, and resource management. The two primary methods for classification are Supervised and Unsupervised Classification . Here's a breakdown of these methods and the key stages of image classification. 1. Types of Classification Supervised Classification In supervised classification, the analyst manually defines classes of interest (known as information classes ), such as "water," "urban," or "vegetation," and identifies training areas —sections of the image that are representative of these classes. Using these training areas, the algorithm learns the spectral characteristics of each class and applies them to classify the entire image. When to Use Supervised Classification: - You have prior knowledge about the c...

Supervised Classification

In the context of Remote Sensing (RS) and Digital Image Processing (DIP) , supervised classification is the process where an analyst defines "training sites" (Areas of Interest or ROIs) representing known land cover classes (e.g., Water, Forest, Urban). The computer then uses these training samples to teach an algorithm how to classify the rest of the image pixels. The algorithms used to classify these pixels are generally divided into two broad categories: Parametric and Nonparametric decision rules. Parametric Decision Rules These algorithms assume that the pixel values in the training data follow a specific statistical distribution—almost always the Gaussian (Normal) distribution (the "Bell Curve"). Key Concept: They model the data using statistical parameters: the Mean vector ( $\mu$ ) and the Covariance matrix ( $\Sigma$ ) . Analogy: Imagine trying to fit a smooth hill over your data points. If a new point lands high up on the hill, it belongs to that cl...

History of GIS

The history of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is rooted in early efforts to understand spatial relationships and patterns, long before the advent of digital computers. While modern GIS emerged in the mid-20th century with advances in computing, its conceptual foundations lie in cartography, spatial analysis, and thematic mapping. Early Roots of Spatial Analysis (Pre-1960s) One of the earliest documented applications of spatial analysis dates back to 1832 , when Charles Picquet , a French geographer and cartographer, produced a cholera mortality map of Paris. In his report Rapport sur la marche et les effets du choléra dans Paris et le département de la Seine , Picquet used graduated color shading to represent cholera deaths per 1,000 inhabitants across 48 districts. This work is widely regarded as an early example of choropleth mapping and thematic cartography applied to epidemiology. A landmark moment in the history of spatial analysis occurred in 1854 , when John Snow inv...

Pre During and Post Disaster

Disaster management is a structured approach aimed at reducing risks, responding effectively, and ensuring a swift recovery from disasters. It consists of three main phases: Pre-Disaster (Mitigation & Preparedness), During Disaster (Response), and Post-Disaster (Recovery). These phases involve various strategies, policies, and actions to protect lives, property, and the environment. Below is a breakdown of each phase with key concepts, terminologies, and examples. 1. Pre-Disaster Phase (Mitigation and Preparedness) Mitigation: This phase focuses on reducing the severity of a disaster by minimizing risks and vulnerabilities. It involves structural and non-structural measures. Hazard Identification: Recognizing potential natural and human-made hazards (e.g., earthquakes, floods, industrial accidents). Risk Assessment: Evaluating the probability and consequences of disasters using GIS, remote sensing, and historical data. Vulnerability Analysis: Identifying areas and p...

Atmospheric Correction

It is the process of removing the influence of the atmosphere from remotely sensed images so that the data accurately represent the true reflectance of Earth's surface . When a satellite sensor captures an image, the radiation reaching the sensor is affected by gases, water vapor, aerosols, and dust in the atmosphere. These factors scatter and absorb light, changing the brightness and color of the features seen in the image. Although these atmospheric effects are part of the recorded signal, they can distort surface reflectance values , especially when images are compared across different dates or sensors . Therefore, corrections are necessary to make data consistent and physically meaningful. 🔹 Why Do We Need Atmospheric Correction? To retrieve true surface reflectance – It separates the surface signal from atmospheric influence. To ensure comparability – Enables comparing images from different times, seasons, or sensors. To improve visual quality – Remo...

Vineesh V, Geography

Search This Blog