Skip to main content

India remote sensing


1. Foundational Phase (Early 1970s – Early 1980s)

Objective: To explore the potential of space-based observation for national development.

  • 1972: The Space Applications Programme (SAP) was initiated by the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), focusing on applying space technology for societal benefits.

  • 1975: The Department of Space (DoS) was established, providing an institutional base for space applications, including remote sensing.

  • 1977: India began aerial and balloon-borne experiments to study Earth resources and assess how remote sensing data could aid in agriculture, forestry, and hydrology.

  • 1978 (June 7): Bhaskara-I launched by the Soviet Union — India's first experimental Earth Observation satellite.

    • Payloads: TV cameras (for land and ocean surface observation) and a Microwave Radiometer.

    • Significance: Proved that satellite-based Earth observation was feasible for India's needs.

  • 1981 (November 20): Bhaskara-II launched.

    • Improvements: Enhanced radiometric and optical sensors for land use, forestry, and hydrology.

    • Outcome: Successful demonstration of indigenous data analysis and interpretation.

2. Institutional Strengthening and User Involvement (1980–1985)

Objective: To integrate remote sensing into national planning.

  • 1980: Aryabhata, India's first satellite (for science/technology), laid the foundation for satellite engineering.

  • 1983: Formation of the National Natural Resources Management System (NNRMS).

    • Purpose: Coordinate and integrate the use of remote sensing data with conventional data for national resource management.

    • Structure: Involved multiple user ministries (agriculture, water, forestry, etc.) and established Regional Remote Sensing Service Centres (RRSSCs).

    • Impact: Shift from experimental use to operational planning.

  • 1984: India began receiving data from LANDSAT and NOAA satellites through its own ground station in Shadnagar, Hyderabad — enhancing domestic data processing capabilities.

3. First-Generation Operational Satellites (1988–1995)

Objective: To launch and operate India's own Earth observation satellites.

  • 1988 (March 17): IRS-1A launched by the Soviet Union's Vostok launcher from Baikonur Cosmodrome.

    • Payload: LISS-I (72.5 m) and LISS-II (36.25 m) multispectral sensors.

    • Orbit: Sun-synchronous polar orbit.

    • Applications: Agriculture, forestry, water resource mapping, and soil studies.

    • Significance: Marked the beginning of the Indian Remote Sensing (IRS) series — India's first operational remote sensing satellite.

  • 1991 (August 29): IRS-1B launched — a near-identical successor with improved calibration and longer life.

    • Outcome: Data from IRS-1A/1B validated the national system for operational resource monitoring.

    • Impact: India achieved self-reliance in Earth observation for key resource sectors.

4. Second-Generation IRS Satellites (1995–2000)

Objective: To enhance spatial resolution and expand thematic applications.

  • 1995 (December 28): IRS-1C launched (from Baikonur).

    • Sensors:

      • PAN (5.8 m),

      • LISS-III (23.5 m),

      • WiFS (188 m).

    • Applications: Cartography, urban planning, and vegetation monitoring.

    • Significance: India entered the high-resolution mapping era.

  • 1997 (September 29): IRS-1D launched — similar to IRS-1C, providing stereo coverage and better radiometric accuracy.

  • 1998: Data from IRS-1C/1D began supporting international users, establishing India as a global remote sensing data provider.

5. Diversification and Specialized Missions (1999–2010)

Objective: To develop satellites tailored for thematic domains — oceans, cartography, and natural resources.

  • 1999 (May 26): IRS-P4 (Oceansat-1) launched.

    • Payload: Ocean Colour Monitor (OCM) and Multi-frequency Scanning Microwave Radiometer (MSMR).

    • Use: Ocean productivity, fisheries, and climate studies.

  • 2001 (May 5): IRS-P6 (Resourcesat-1) launched.

    • Sensors: LISS-III, LISS-IV, and AWiFS.

    • Purpose: Detailed agricultural and natural resource management.

  • 2005 (May 5): IRS-P5 (Cartosat-1) launched.

    • Payload: Two panchromatic cameras providing 2.5 m stereo imagery.

    • Applications: High-resolution cartography and digital elevation models (DEMs).

  • 2007 (October 23): Cartosat-2 launched — sub-meter resolution imagery.

    • Use: Urban planning, infrastructure, and defense.

  • 2009 (September 23): Oceansat-2 launched — followed by the Megha-Tropiques and SARAL (joint missions for climate and ocean studies).

6. Modernization and Microwave Era (2011–Present)

Objective: Integration of optical and microwave sensors, enhanced revisit times, and global data distribution.

  • 2013 (April 28): Resourcesat-2 launched — continuation of Resourcesat-1 with improved radiometry.

  • 2016 (March 10): Cartosat-2C launched — 0.65 m resolution; supported Smart City and infrastructure projects.

  • 2018 (March 12): Cartosat-2F launched, maintaining high-resolution optical imaging continuity.

  • 2019 (December 11): RISAT-2BR1 launched — radar imaging satellite with all-weather day-night capability.

    • Microwave sensors: Enabled mapping even under cloud cover, marking India's operational SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) era.

  • 2020–2023:

    • Launch of EOS (Earth Observation Satellite) series — replacing IRS nomenclature.

    • Satellites: EOS-01 (RISAT-type), EOS-04 (Radar), EOS-06 (Oceansat-3).

    • Integration of optical, microwave, and hyperspectral imaging systems.

7. Current Framework and Data Access (2020s–Present)

Objective: Streamline commercial and data dissemination processes.

  • 2020: Formation of NewSpace India Limited (NSIL) — a commercial arm of ISRO, responsible for marketing remote sensing data globally.

  • 2021: Launch of Bhoonidhi (Bhuvan-NIDHI) — ISRO's centralized data dissemination platform.

    • Provides access to IRS and EOS datasets for research, academia, and government users.

  • 2023–2025:

    • Integration with Digital India and Gati Shakti initiatives.

    • IRS data now forms the backbone of India's resource management, agriculture monitoring, climate resilience, and disaster response.

    • Over 15 active IRS/EOS satellites, making it the largest civilian remote sensing constellation globally.


PhaseYearsKey SatellitesMajor Achievements
Experimental1978–1981Bhaskara I & IIFirst Earth observation experiments
Institutionalization1983–1987NNRMS setupIntegration of users and ministries
First Generation1988–1991IRS-1A, 1BOperational remote sensing begins
Second Generation1995–2000IRS-1C, 1DHigh-resolution multispectral imaging
Specialized Missions1999–2010Oceansat, Cartosat, ResourcesatThematic data for various domains
Microwave & Modern Era2011–PresentRISAT, EOS seriesAll-weather, day-night, multi-sensor observation


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Geometric Correction

When satellite or aerial images are captured, they often contain distortions (errors in shape, scale, or position) caused by many factors — like Earth's curvature, satellite motion, terrain height (relief), or the Earth's rotation . These distortions make the image not properly aligned with real-world coordinates (latitude and longitude). 👉 Geometric correction is the process of removing these distortions so that every pixel in the image correctly represents its location on the Earth's surface. After geometric correction, the image becomes geographically referenced and can be used with maps and GIS data. Types  1. Systematic Correction Systematic errors are predictable and can be modeled mathematically. They occur due to the geometry and movement of the satellite sensor or the Earth. Common systematic distortions: Scan skew – due to the motion of the sensor as it scans the Earth. Mirror velocity variation – scanning mirror moves at a va...
Post a Comment
Read more

RADIOMETRIC CORRECTION

  Radiometric correction is the process of removing sensor and environmental errors from satellite images so that the measured brightness values (Digital Numbers or DNs) truly represent the Earth's surface reflectance or radiance. In other words, it corrects for sensor defects, illumination differences, and atmospheric effects. 1. Detector Response Calibration Satellite sensors use multiple detectors to scan the Earth's surface. Sometimes, each detector responds slightly differently, causing distortions in the image. Calibration adjusts all detectors to respond uniformly. This includes: (a) De-Striping Problem: Sometimes images show light and dark vertical or horizontal stripes (banding). Caused by one or more detectors drifting away from their normal calibration — they record higher or lower values than others. Common in early Landsat MSS data. Effect: Every few lines (e.g., every 6th line) appear consistently brighter or darker. Soluti...
Post a Comment
Read more

Atmospheric Correction

It is the process of removing the influence of the atmosphere from remotely sensed images so that the data accurately represent the true reflectance of Earth's surface . When a satellite sensor captures an image, the radiation reaching the sensor is affected by gases, water vapor, aerosols, and dust in the atmosphere. These factors scatter and absorb light, changing the brightness and color of the features seen in the image. Although these atmospheric effects are part of the recorded signal, they can distort surface reflectance values , especially when images are compared across different dates or sensors . Therefore, corrections are necessary to make data consistent and physically meaningful. 🔹 Why Do We Need Atmospheric Correction? To retrieve true surface reflectance – It separates the surface signal from atmospheric influence. To ensure comparability – Enables comparing images from different times, seasons, or sensors. To improve visual quality – Remo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Supervised Classification

In the context of Remote Sensing (RS) and Digital Image Processing (DIP) , supervised classification is the process where an analyst defines "training sites" (Areas of Interest or ROIs) representing known land cover classes (e.g., Water, Forest, Urban). The computer then uses these training samples to teach an algorithm how to classify the rest of the image pixels. The algorithms used to classify these pixels are generally divided into two broad categories: Parametric and Nonparametric decision rules. Parametric Decision Rules These algorithms assume that the pixel values in the training data follow a specific statistical distribution—almost always the Gaussian (Normal) distribution (the "Bell Curve"). Key Concept: They model the data using statistical parameters: the Mean vector ( $\mu$ ) and the Covariance matrix ( $\Sigma$ ) . Analogy: Imagine trying to fit a smooth hill over your data points. If a new point lands high up on the hill, it belongs to that cl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pre During and Post Disaster

Disaster management is a structured approach aimed at reducing risks, responding effectively, and ensuring a swift recovery from disasters. It consists of three main phases: Pre-Disaster (Mitigation & Preparedness), During Disaster (Response), and Post-Disaster (Recovery). These phases involve various strategies, policies, and actions to protect lives, property, and the environment. Below is a breakdown of each phase with key concepts, terminologies, and examples. 1. Pre-Disaster Phase (Mitigation and Preparedness) Mitigation: This phase focuses on reducing the severity of a disaster by minimizing risks and vulnerabilities. It involves structural and non-structural measures. Hazard Identification: Recognizing potential natural and human-made hazards (e.g., earthquakes, floods, industrial accidents). Risk Assessment: Evaluating the probability and consequences of disasters using GIS, remote sensing, and historical data. Vulnerability Analysis: Identifying areas and p...
Post a Comment
Read more